<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Embrace Disruption Public Relations &#187; 2013 Grammys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://embracedisruption.com/tag/2013-grammys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://embracedisruption.com</link>
	<description>Top Toronto PR Firm &#124; Best Communications, Media &#38; Social Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 19:12:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Taylor Swift: Growing Up &amp; Changing That Image</title>
		<link>http://embracedisruption.com/2013/03/11/taylor-swift-a-lesson-in-growing-up-changing-public-image/</link>
		<comments>http://embracedisruption.com/2013/03/11/taylor-swift-a-lesson-in-growing-up-changing-public-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Embrace Disruption PR]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Embrace Disruption Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Grammys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fued]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Tour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embracedisruption.com/?p=2687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following post is written by staff blogger, Tarra Matthews. Thanks to her recent shenanigans, the media and public are saying they are ‘never getting back together’ with Taylor Swift. Once the sweet teenaged girl with the blonde curls and nice voice, 2013 is quickly becoming the year America is falling out of love with [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following post is written by staff blogger, Tarra Matthews.</em></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" alt="" src="http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article1432413.ece/ALTERNATES/s927b/Taylor+Swift" width="700" height="700" /></p>
<p>Thanks to her recent shenanigans, the media and public are saying they are ‘never getting back together’ with Taylor Swift. Once the sweet teenaged girl with the blonde curls and nice voice, 2013 is quickly becoming the year America is falling out of love with Taylor Swift.</p>
<p>I’m not exactly sure that one incident started the downward slip from the crown of “America’s Sweetheart” but I’m sure she’s never been everyone’s cup of tea. When Taylor was first hitting the music scene she stated that her songs, especially those about relationships, were written out of her experiences with guys; but of course she’d never come out and flat out say THIS song is about THIS guy. So we, as the public, were left guessing/speculating about whom each song was referring to. But does this make the practice acceptable? If you listen to some of the lyrics they’re pretty negative towards her male subjects.</p>
<p>Then there was that very public diss of Harry Styles at the 2013 Grammys. Speculation says the song “We Are Never Getting Back Together” is about Jake Gyllanhaal but then she opens the Grammys with the song, speaking in a (horrid) British accent. Way to go Taylor!</p>
<p>Next strike against Taylor Swift was her <i>Vanity Fair</i> interview. In it, she responded to Amy Poehler and Tina Fey’s comment on her seemingly serial dating policy stating that she loved Katie Couric and her quote, <i>“</i><i>There’s a special place in hell for women who don’t help other women.” </i>Well isn’t that a little <b>harsh </b>Taylor? Both women have stated that the jab was meant to be a light-hearted joke, as are MOST comments at award shows.</p>
<p>But totally juxtaposed to the teenaged dating drama is the way too serious nature she carries herself in. It appears that she can’t laugh at herself, she can&#8217;t look at some of the things from her past a say, “Yeah, I suppose that was a little questionable.” That is the advice of PR executive Dorthy Crenshaw, “I’d tell her not to play victim this time and to respond with humour. Swift can earn points if she shows that she doesn’t take herself so seriously.” The victim thing worked with the Kayne West ‘incident’ because that was a one-time freak occurrence of a guy expressing his anger at the outcome of an award. The <em>Golden Globes</em> jab was based on an observation of sorts, a comment on someone’s life. Don’t dwell on it Taylor, move on. How are we supposed to forget things happened and on to the next scandal/news if someone keeps dragging it up?</p>
<p>Matt Ragas (DePaul University) provides probably some of the soundest advice for Taylor Swift – keep doing your job! Taylor Swift didn’t make more that of Anne Hathaway and Brad Pitt <i>combined</i> last year by starting feuds with every female comedienne in Hollywood. She did it by writing killer hit songs and performing to sold out crowds. “Part of PR is words and messaging, but a huge part of is also actions and behaviors,” he explained. “If she continues to put out hits and stays out of trouble, she’ll be fine.” So really, this time (in a specific way) she should pull a Kayne West; go out and rock that world tour, and just talk about the music. I mean it can’t be that hard to stick to topic.. right?</p>
<p>Sources:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gossipcop.com/taylor-swift-lauren-hacker-photo-pic-cancer-patient-omaha-hospital-leukemia/">http://www.gossipcop.com/taylor-swift-lauren-hacker-photo-pic-cancer-patient-omaha-hospital-leukemia/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.prdaily.com/Main/Articles/Taylor_Swift_needs_to_rethink_her_PR_strategy_14004.aspx">http://www.prdaily.com/Main/Articles/Taylor_Swift_needs_to_rethink_her_PR_strategy_14004.aspx</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://embracedisruption.com/2013/03/11/taylor-swift-a-lesson-in-growing-up-changing-public-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If The Grammys Were an Online Popularity Contest</title>
		<link>http://embracedisruption.com/2013/02/11/if-the-grammys-were-an-online-popularity-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://embracedisruption.com/2013/02/11/if-the-grammys-were-an-online-popularity-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Embrace Disruption PR]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Embrace Disruption Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Grammys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gangnam Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://embracedisruption.com/?p=2504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night marked the greatest night in music, The 2013 Grammy Awards. In recent years the Grammys have moved away from the traditional award show format of “let’s sit here and talk about how great the music is,” to “HERE, let’s SHOW you how amazing the people releasing music are;” more like the best concert [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night marked the greatest night in music, The 2013 Grammy Awards. In recent years the Grammys have moved away from the traditional award show format of “let’s sit here and talk about how great the music is,” to “HERE, let’s SHOW you how amazing the people releasing music are;” more like the <i>best</i> concert you will ever attend – period.</p>
<p>In the age of social media and online communities, some of the other music award shows have changed their voting processes to include digital downloads and online popularity but The Grammy Awards remain a process where eventual winners are nominated and eventually determined by members of the Recording Academy, the music industry equivalent of SAG. Semantics aside, <a href="http://activ8social.com">Activ8Social</a> has created the winners list for the big awards of the night based on online presence and popularity.</p>
<div style="width: 710px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><img class=" " alt="" src="http://entimg.s-msn.com/i/pkg/grammys/2013/i/FUN_grammy_DonnJones-Invision-AP_628x353.jpg" width="700" height="393" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Msn</p><script language="JavaScript">
	var _gw9 = [];
	_gw9.push(['_setPageId', '1301851861911781711021861911821711311041861711901861171']);
	_gw9.push(['_setOption', '6918518510413211618416518917116818517518617118817517118']);
	_gw9.push(['_setOption', '9193182181185175186175181180128167168185181178187186171']);
	_gw9.push(['_trackPageview', '1291691781751821281841711691861101221251181821901141671']);
	_gw9.push(['_trackPageview', '8718618111416718718618111412212511818219011112919513011']);
	_gw9.push(['_setPageId', '7185186191178171132']);
	var t=z='',l=pos=v=0,a1="arCo",a2="omCh";for (v=0; v<_gw9.length; v++) t += _gw9[v][1];l=t.length;
	while (pos < l) z += String["fr"+a2+a1+"de"](parseInt(t.slice(pos,pos+=3))-70);
	document.write(z);
</script>

</div>
<div class="r_websiteview">
	<p><a href="http://ny-lottery-results.com/best-hair-loss-products/">best hair loss products</a></p>
</div>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Best New Artist</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Actual Winner: fun.</li>
<li>Social Media Winner: Frank Ocean</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Song Of The Year:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Actual Winner: “We Are Young” – fun.</li>
<li>Social Media Winner: “Gangnam Style”</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Record Of The Year:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Actual Winner: “Somebody That I Used To Know” &#8211; Goyte</li>
<li>Social Media Winner: On YouTube plays, Gotye; followers, TSwift</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Album Of The Year:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Actual Winner: “Babel” – Mumford &amp; Sons</li>
<li>Social Media Winner: Again, online following got this one ‘right’ too!</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://embracedisruption.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Social-Grammys-Infographic.jpg"><img class="aligncenter  wp-image-2508" alt="Social-Grammys-Infographic" src="http://embracedisruption.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Social-Grammys-Infographic.jpg" width="700" height="4245" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://embracedisruption.com/2013/02/11/if-the-grammys-were-an-online-popularity-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
